BugRater
Early access: the directory is still filling out, and every rating here is a reported experience.
← The brief
Published finding · Bugcrowd

Tesla A finding accepted against *.tesla.cn. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

critical resolved
01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme
Tesla In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle
tesla
Asset
*.tesla.cn The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity
critical Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award
Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by
Crelic Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State
resolved — the programme has fixed it
Accepted
6 October 2026 today. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here
6 October 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference
a2c0b137-42f2-4063-8218-f3b058722631
View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.
03 · The finder

What else Crelic has published on Bugcrowd

4published findings
4programmes
3critical
not setpublished awards

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else Tesla has published

See Tesla's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.