Published finding · Bugcrowd

$400 awarded on iRobot, against iRobot API Endpoint.

medium paid unresolved

01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme: iRobot In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle: irobot
Asset: iRobot API Endpoint The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity: medium Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award: $400 What the platform printed. Where a report carried more than one payment they are summed.
Found by: liorliore1310c Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State: unresolved — accepted, not yet fixed
Accepted: 1 October 2026 4 days ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here: 1 October 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference: 710e3844-8ab1-43f4-b08d-e1f08a1e1865

View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.

02 · Is this figure normal

Where this award sits

A single large number tells you nothing on its own. What matters is whether this programme pays like this routinely or whether this was the one time it did.

#6 of 9 here

$750 this programme's median

$1,500 its largest published

#781 of 1,513 awards we hold

It is the 6th largest of 9 awards this programme has published. It sits below this programme's median, so larger figures are routine here.

Every figure here is drawn only from awards a platform chose to publish, which is a minority of what gets paid. Read the median as "of the payouts made public", never as "what this programme pays".

03 · The finder

The only finding we hold from liorliore1310c

This is the only published finding we hold from liorliore1310c on Bugcrowd. That is a statement about our coverage, not about their record: we read a few pages of each feed per sweep, and most accepted work is never published at all.

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else iRobot has published

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.irobot.home.prime high · resolved · rdxcft · 10 days ago $750
iRobot API Endpoint medium · unresolved · EmperorEye · 24 days ago —
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.irobot.home.prime high · unresolved · noddyh12 · 3 months ago $1,000
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.irobot.home.prime high · unresolved · marius_dp · 4 months ago $1,500
iRobot API Endpoint high · unresolved · ElliotAnderson · 4 months ago $750
https://www.irobot.com medium · unresolved · withheld · 5 months ago —
iRobot Roomba™ 105 critical · unresolved · hackprime · 5 months ago —
https://www.irobot.ie/ low · unresolved · JagadeeshNaidu-666 · 6 months ago $250

See iRobot's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.