BugRater
Early access: the directory is still filling out, and every rating here is a reported experience.
← The brief
Published finding · Bugcrowd

Internet Brands Public A finding accepted against https://www.webmd.com. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

high unresolved
01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme
Internet Brands Public In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle
internetbrands-public
Asset
https://www.webmd.com The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity
high Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award
Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by
wilson2333 Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State
unresolved — accepted, not yet fixed
Accepted
1 October 2026 4 days ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here
1 October 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference
c37f4f76-c742-4c98-944f-88339fac2800
View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.
03 · The finder

What else wilson2333 has published on Bugcrowd

14published findings
12programmes
1critical
$6,250published awards

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else Internet Brands Public has published

See Internet Brands Public's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.