Published finding · Bugcrowd

U.S. Department of Commerce - Vulnerability Disclosure Program A finding accepted against *.noaa.gov. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

low resolved

01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme: U.S. Department of Commerce - Vulnerability Disclosure Program Not in our directory yet, so there is no grade or review page for it. The event is kept regardless.
Platform handle: usdoc-vdp
Asset: *.noaa.gov The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity: low Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award: Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by: Withheld The platform did not publish a name. We store that as withheld and never guess.
State: resolved — the programme has fixed it
Accepted: 29 September 2026 8 days ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here: 29 September 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference: f84a1da8-a291-4170-a30f-522cea612770

View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.

03 · The programme

What else U.S. Department of Commerce - Vulnerability Disclosure Program has published

*.noaa.gov critical · unresolved · xr34p_ · 2 days ago —
*.noaa.gov critical · unresolved · robotnik · 6 days ago —
*.noaa.gov high · unresolved · thepiyushkumarshukla · 7 days ago —
*.noaa.gov medium · unresolved · HealthStone69 · 7 days ago —
*.noaa.gov medium · unresolved · HealthStone69 · 9 days ago —
*.noaa.gov low · unresolved · 3p1c0w3nd · 14 days ago —
*.census.gov high · resolved · withheld · 20 days ago —
*.census.gov critical · unresolved · Sleibe · 20 days ago —

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.